Aristotle and the Conceptual Unity of Friendship (φιλία) in the Nicomachean Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2735-6140.18Keywords:
Amistad, Aristóteles, semejanza, analogía, homonimiaAbstract
Aristotle devotes two full books of the Nicomachean Ethics (NE) to friendship (φιλία) and to the questions that have generated contrary and diverse opinions about it. Among such problems is whether friendship is one or several. Aristotle considers that there are three types of friendship: one that is founded on good or virtue, another that is based on pleasure, and the last one that refers to utility. However, the type of conceptual unity that friendship would have has been the subject of discussion among the author's commentators. In this paper, we intend to show that the type of conceptual unity that friendship has is that of the analogy that occurs based on the similarity between the types of friendship. For this purpose, in the first section, the distinction between homonymy and synonymy will be addressed, as well as the notion of unity to understand the problem. Along with this, the question of what friendship is and in how many senses it is said will be discussed. In the last section it will discuss the linking of similarity and analogy and then the use of the expression 'by resemblance' (καθ' ὁμοιότητα) to finally show how analogical unity would apply to the case of friendship.
Downloads
References
Aristóteles. Aristotelis. De Anima, ed. William David Ross. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Aristóteles. Aristotelis. Ethica Nicomachea, ed. Ingram Bywater. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.
Aristóteles. Aristotelis. Ethica Eudemia, ed. Richard Rudolf Walzer y Jean Mingay. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
Aristóteles. Aristotle Categories, On Interpretation, Prior Analytics, ed. Jeffrey Henderson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1938.
Aristóteles. Aristotelis. Metaphysica, ed. Werner Jaeger. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.
Aristóteles. Aristotle. Parts of Animals, Movement of Animals, Progression of Animals, ed. Arthur Leslie Peck y Edward Seymour Foster. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961.
Aristóteles. Aristotle. Politics, ed. Harris Rackham. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Aristóteles. Aristotle Posterior analytics: Topica, ed. Jeffrey Henderson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.
Aristóteles. Categorías, trad. Eduardo Sinnott. Buenos Aires: Colihue, 2009.
Aristóteles. De Anima, trad. Marcelo Boeri. Buenos Aires: Colihue, 2015.
Aristóteles. Ética Nicomaquea. Buenos Aires: Colihue, 2010.
Aristóteles. Ética nicomáquea: Ética eudemia, trad. Emilio Lledó y Julio Pallí Bonet. Madrid: Gredos, 1985.
Aristóteles. Metafísica, trad. Tomás Calvo. Madrid: Gredos, 2011.
Aristóteles. Poética, trad. Eduardo Sinnott. Buenos Aires: Colihue, 2015.
Aristóteles. Política, trad. Manuela García Valdés. Madrid: Gredos, 1988.
Aristóteles. Tratados de lógica (Órganon) I, trad. Miguel Sanmartín. Madrid: Gredos, 1982.
Calvo, Tomás. “La unidad de la noción de la ΦΙΛΙΑ en Aristóteles”, Méthexis XX (2007): 63–82.
Fortenbaugh, William. “Aristotle’s Analysis of Friendship: Function and Analogy, Resemblance, and Focal Meaning”, Phronesis 20 (1975): 51–62.
Irwin, Terrence. “Homonymy in Aristotle”. Review of Metaphysics 34 (1981): 523–544.
Nussbaum, Martha. The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Shields, Christopher. Order in Multiplicity. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
Sinnott, Eduardo. “Acerca de la relación semántica entre las formas de la amistad en Aristóteles”, Stromata 70/1 (2014): 87–106.
Vigo, Alejandro. Aristóteles. Una introducción. Santiago: Instituto de Estudios de la Sociedad (2006).
Ward, Julie. Aristotle on Homonymy – Dialectic and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Zingano, Marco. “The Conceptual Unity of Friendship in the Eudemian and the Nicomachean Ethics”, Apeiron 48/2 (2015): 195–219.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Diana Núñez Aguilera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.