The transcendental necessity of the body. The second theorem (§3) in Fichte’s natural rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2735-6140.76Keywords:
Intersubjectivity, human body, exhortation, Fichte, HonnethAbstract
The aim of this research is to return to the now famous second theorem that Fichte expounds in his Foundations of Natural Right of 1796, specifically to how exhortation is introduced as the foundation of intersubjectivity. According to certain positions, such as Honneth's, the doctrine of exhortation would fail to justify intersubjective relations as a transcendental condition for the constitution of self-consciousness. Because of this, it seems difficult to situate Fichte as the progenitor of the intersubjectivist tradition. However, it will be argued that this argument can be salvaged if 1) one reevaluates Fichte's transcendental method as distinct from that expounded by Kant, 2) one shows that in fact the second theorem resolves a contradiction put by Fichte in the first two paragraphs, and 3) if one completes the argument of the exhortation with the development made of corporeality in the second part of the treatise. With this, it will be possible to realize that the argument of the exhortation manages to be completed through the pre-reflective recognition of a human figure (Menschliche Gestalt) that Fichte puts as a transcendental condition of the recognition of a rational being.
Downloads
References
Bernstein, J. M. (2010). Recognition and Embodiment: Fichte's Materialism (pp. 47-88). En H.-C. Schmidt am Busch, & C. F. Zurn (Eds.), The Philosophy of Recognition. Lextington Books.
Bisol, B. (2007). Der Leib ist ein Bild des Ich. Transzendentalphilosophische Grundlegung der Leiblichkeit bei J. G. Fichte (pp. 45-64). En C. Asmuth (Ed.), Transzendentalphilosophie und Person. Leiblichkeit - Interpesonalität - Anerkennung. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Bisol, B. (2011). Körper, Freiheit und Wille: Die transzendentalphilosophische Leiblehre J. G. Fichtes. Würzburg: Ergon.
Carvalho, M. J. (2016, diciembre 01). Fichte and the Body in Action. Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte. doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.683
Córsico, L. (2015). Cuerpo, figura y reconocimiento en Grundlage des Naturrechts (1796/1797) de J. G. Fichte. Philosophia, 75(2), 9-32.
Dryden, J. (2013). Embodiment and Vulnerability in Fichte and Hegel. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/ Revue Canadienne De Philosophie, 52(1), 109-128. doi:10.1017/S0012217313000164
Estes, Y. (2002). Intellectual intuition, the Pure Will, and the Categorical Imperative in the Later Jena Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 209-225). En T. Rockmore, & D. Breazeale (Eds.), New Essays on Fichte's Later Jena Wissenchaftslehre. Northwestern University Press.
Fichte, J. G. (1994). Fundamentos del derecho natural (trad. J. L. Villacañas, M. Ramos, F. Oncina Coves). Centro de estudios constitucionales.
Fichte, J. G. (1962-2021). Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. (R. Lauth, H. Gliwitzky, G. Zöller, & H. Jacob, Eds.), Frommann-holzboog.
Frank, P. (2016). Fichte’s Position: Anti-Subjectivism, Self-Awareness and Self-Location in the Space of Reason (pp. 374-404). En D. James & G. Zöller (Eds.), The Cambridge to Fichte. Cambridge University Press.
Heap, J. L. (2021). The Creative Imagination: indeterminacy and embodiment in the writing of Kant, Fichte, and Castoriadis. Rowman & Littlefield.
Honneth, A. (2016). Die transzendentale Notwendigkeit von Intersubjektivität (Zweiter Lehrsatz: § 3) (pp. 57-74). En J.-C. Merle (Ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Ikäheimo, H. (2009). Fichte über Auffordern und Anerkennen (pp. 29-62). En C. F. Zurn, & H.-C. Schmidt am Busch (Eds.), Anerkennung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
James, D. (2016). Fichte and Hegel on Recognition and Slavery (pp. 350-373). En D. James, & G. Zöller (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Fichte. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2007). Crítica de la razón pura (trad. Mario Caimi). Colihue.
López-Domínguez, V. (1995). Fichte: Acción y Libertad. Madrid: Ediciones pedagógicas.
López-Domínguez, V. (2024). Fichte o el yo encarnado en el mundo intersubjetivo. Ragif ediciones.
McNulty, J. (2016). Transcendental Philosophy and Intersubjectivity: Mutual Recognition as a Condition for the Possibility of Self-Consciousness in Sections 1-3 of Fichte's Foundation of Natural Right. European Journal of Philosophy, 24(4), 1-23.
McNulty, K. (2016). Transcendental philosophy and intersubjectivity: mutual recognition as a condition for the possibility of self-consciousness in sections 1-3 of Fichte’s Foundation of Natural Right. Eouropean Journal of Philosophy.
Merle, J.-C. (2010). Struggle for Recognition, Ethics of Recognition, Loss Recognition (pp. 83-96). En P. Cobben (Ed.), Institution of Education: then and today. Brill.
Neuhouser, F. (1990). Fichte’s theory of subjectivity. Cambridge University Press.
Nomer, N. (2010). Fichte and the Relationship between Self-Positing and Rights. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(4), 469-490.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2010.0020
Nuzzo, A. (2006). The role of the Human body in Fichte's Grundlage des Naturrechts (1796-97) (pp. 57-75). En B. a. Rights, T. Rockmore, & D. Breazeale (Eds.). Burlington: Ashgate.
Nuzzo, A. (2021). Embodiment and Freedom: Fichte “On the Material of the Ethical Law” (pp. 150-177). En S. Bacin, & O. Ware (Eds.), Fichte's System of Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Renaut, A. (2016). Deduktion des Rechts (Dritter Lehrsatz: § 4) (Vol. 24, pp. 75-88). En J.-C. Merle (Ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts. De Gruyter.
Rockmore, T. (2014). Filosofía trascendental e idealismo en Fichte. Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.555.
Russon, J. (2016). The Body as Site of Action and Intersubjectivity in Fichte's Foundations of Natural Right (pp. 138-156). En G. Gottlieb (Ed.), Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A critical guide. Cambridge University Press.
Scribner, S. F. (2010). Falsification: On the Role of the Empirical in J. G. Fichte’s Transcendental Method (pp. 117-130). En D. Breazeale & T. Rockmore (Eds.), Fichte, German Idealism, and Early Romanticism. Brill.
Vargas Bejarano, J. C. (2016). Karl Reinhold y Edmund Husserl. Dos concepciones de la fenomenología. Estudios de Filosofía (53), 9-33.
Wilhelm, H.-J. (2002). The “Deduction of the Individual”: Fichte's Efforts to “Complete” the Jena Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 28-46). En T. Rockmore, & D. Breazeale (Eds.), New Essays on Fichte's later Jena Wissenschaftslehre. Northwestern University Press.
Wood, A. W. (2014). The Free Development of Each. Oxford University Press.
Wood, A. W. (2016). Deduction of the Summons and the Existence of Other Rational Beings (pp. 71-91). En G. Gottlieb (Ed.), Fichte's Foundations of natural right. Cambridge University Press.
Zöller, G. (1999, Diciembre). Die Individualität des Ich in Fichtes Zweiter Jenaer Wissenschaftslehre (1796-1799). Revue Internartionale de Philosophie, 52 (206), 641-663.
Zöller, G. (2016). Leib, Materie und gemeinsames Wollen als Anwendungsbedingungen des Rechts (Zweites Hauptstück: §§ 5–7) (pp. 89-102). En J.-C. Merle (Ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts. Walter de Gruyter.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Feyie Ferrán Pizarro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
